Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Medical Education ; : 391-397, 2007.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-370017

ABSTRACT

Positive self-esteem helps students build and maintain self-efficacies to affect later clinical practice. We examined the outcome of problem-based-learning (PBL) curriculum by evaluating self-efficacy in terms of sustained learning and clinical competencies among medical school graduates.<BR>1) We compared practicing doctors who either had PBL tutorial experience or who had not by a questionnaire survey.<BR>2) The subjects self-evaluated whether they had achieved expected abilities (1) at the end of undergraduate years, (2) during 2-year internship, and (3) at present.<BR>3) Among 1, 502 doctors surveyed (response rate=36.0%), doctors with PBL tutorial experience had higher selfefficacy (odds ratio>2.1) in their clinical abilities than doctors without it, especially during the school years.<BR>4) In the later 2 periods, doctors with PBL experience had higher self-efficacy in communication skills.<BR>5) PBL tutorial foster self-efficacy in clinical abilities, especially in communication skills, during earlier clinical career.

2.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 67-71, 2007.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-275231

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>In this study, we compared the choice of medical specialty and subspecialty interest among problem-based-learning (PBL) graduates and non-PBL graduates.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>Questionnaires were mailed to a total of 1398 female doctors who graduated from Tokyo Women's Medical University (TWMU) between 1989 and 2003. The response rate was over 30%, giving 248 respondents who had undergone a PBL curriculum (PBL+) and 220 subjects who had not (PBL-). Current specialty of the graduates were compared between the PBL+ and PBL-, and also compared with the general Japanese female doctors (Control 1 and 2) of similar age groups. Respondents were analysed in terms of their interests in subspecialty medical care or general medical practise, which includes comprehensive medical care, primary care and basic medicine. Internal medicine doctors working in the university hospitals were compared with those working outside the university hospitals. Internal medicine doctors were also compared with specialists in ophthalmology, otolaryngology, dermatology and psychiatry. Subjects were compared by odds ratio (OR) to examine group difference in the field of interest. OR >2.0 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Most doctors in all groups chose internal medicine. More PBL+ internal medicine doctors showed interests in comprehensive medical care and primary care; more PBL+ internal medicine doctors working outside university hospitals showed interest in comprehensive medical care and primary care when compared with those who were working in the university hospitals. The PBL- graduates did not show such a characteristic.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>More PBL+ graduates who chose internal medicine showed interest in holistic medical practices such as primary care and community medicine and more PBL+ specialists showed sustained interest in their respective fields.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Career Choice , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Internal Medicine , Japan , Problem-Based Learning
3.
General Medicine ; : 45-52, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-376340

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to compare the characteristics of medical practitioners who prefer using the Internet as their information resource and those who prefer using printed materials.<BR>METHODS: From December 2002 to January 2003, a non-anonymous questionnaire was sent out by post to members of the Japanese Medical Association (JMA) and physicians working in hospitals. Contributing factors were examined by using logistic regression analysis.<BR>RESULTS: The response rates for the questionnaires were 18.7% (n=1868) for JMA physicians and 68.0% (n=5901) for hospital physicians. Factors associated with the preference for using the Internet were: ‘younger age’; ‘use of the Internet to solve clinical problems and uncertainties’; ‘use of personal computers at work’; and, ‘use of personal computers at home’.<BR>CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that, although some younger physicians prefer printed materials, providing medical information via the Internet is better suited for younger physicians who are making full use of computers. In contrast, older physicians prefer printed materials because they tend to be less familiar with using computers and may have limited accessibility to the Internet. Therefore, using both the Internet and printed materials to provide medical information is necessary to meet the needs of the larger physician population.

4.
General Medicine ; : 13-20, 2004.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-376317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: physicians' awareness regarding evidence-based medicine (EBM), clinical practice guidelines, and clinical information resources were rarely examined in Japan. We need to know them prior to the initiation of the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) by the Japan Council for Quality Health Care (JCQHC) .<BR>METHODS: A total of 10, 000 directors/owners of private clinics (CDs: clinic physicians) affiliated with the Japan Medical Association (JMA) and 8682 physicians working for hospitals certified by the JCQHC (HDs: hospital physicians) were randomly selected and surveyed by a mailed questionnaire.<BR>RESULTS: The response rate to the questionnaire was 18.7% (n=1865) among CDs and 67.8% (n=5885) among HDs. The percentage of respondents who uses internet was 39.9% among CDs and 69.3% among HDs. The information resource most commonly used by all respondents was medical journals, followed by textbooks. The percentage of respondents who used medical literature database was 10.8% among CDs and 49.7% among HDs, respectively. Approximately 80% of all respondents approved implementing EBM in daily practice. Fifty percent of all respondents indicated to have used clinical practice guidelines, and 90% of all the guideline users replied that clinical practice guidelines are useful tools for clinical decision-making. Over half of HDs required to access to the abstracts of the literature cited in the guidelines.<BR>CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians who responded to the survey acknowledged that EBM will contribute to improving the quality of medical services. They are positive in using clinical practice guidelines that include a series of recommendations proposed by specialists in the relevant field (s) in accordance to the reviewed evidence.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL